Code-owned workflow automation for regulated enterprise operations.

Astute lets teams define workflows in Git, validate and simulate changes, then run cases, tasks, approvals, queues, SLAs, and audit through governed cloud or self-hosted runtime environments.

Workflow-as-codeProvider rails control proof
Talk to us about a design-partner workflowSee the workflow proof
Design-partner proof path
This page is for qualified workflow conversations, not broad self-serve signup. The right first step is one painful workflow with a business owner and technical owner.
Runnable provider-rails proof
The current provider-rails-control proof can be walked through as workflow source, validation, simulation, diagrams, deployment preview, scenario runs, assertions, and Studio, Work, Admin, and SDK/API evidence.
Contracts before connectors
The demo allows the approved Astute/reference provider, denies a candidate provider with provider_candidate_only, and records a missing capability request instead of running a live vendor connector.
Workflow source in Git
Workflow packages are authored, reviewed, validated, simulated, and deployed like software instead of hidden configuration.
Cases, tasks, approvals, and SLAs
Astute runs the operational layer around workflow packages: live cases, human work, queues, approvals, deadlines, and escalation state.
Audit and governance by default
Every important package, deployment, case, task, approval, SLA, and blocked path has explicit evidence for review.

Starting with financial-institution workflows.

The first proof path is bank customer onboarding and KYC because it exercises the hard parts: external intake, completeness review, deterministic screening, conditional compliance review, exception approval, activation, notification, SLA state, and audit.

Good first workflows
Bank customer onboarding and KYCInternal access approvalsLending and exception reviewCompliance case reviewInsurance claims and FNOLVendor onboarding and finance approvals
What a demo shows
Demo fixtures and provider decisions are labelled honestly. The current launch point proves provider contracts, governance, missing-request evidence, and negative paths before connecting real banking, KYC, insurance, provisioning, or risk-score providers.
workflow sourcevalidation reportsimulation reportdiagramdeployment previewprovider rails reportapproved reference-provider pathcandidate provider deniedmissing capability requestrunning casehuman taskapprovalSLAaudit trailWork, Studio, Admin, and SDK/API viewsone blocked or invalid path
Design-partner fit
Astute is looking for narrow, practical workflow proofs rather than broad transformation programs.
one painful regulated workflowa business owner and technical ownerhuman review, approvals, SLAs, and audit needscurrent change-control pain in low-code tools, spreadsheets, email, or custom systemsa path to a 4 to 6 week proof if the workflow maps well
The design-partner ask
Pick one workflow. Compare the current change cycle against a workflow-as-code proof. If Astute maps to the pain, scope a pilot with the business and technical owner.
Talk to us about a design-partner workflow